Zimbabwe Prison Warden Sued for Political Activism

Lawyer challenges civil servant's involvement in ruling party campaigns

by Victor Adetimilehin

Zimbabwe is known for its tense political climate and frequent human rights violations. But a recent lawsuit has brought a new dimension to the country’s politics: the role of civil servants in partisan activities.


A Harare lawyer, Takudzwa Edward Mudzuri, has filed a case against a prison warden, Caroline Majongo, for allegedly engaging in politics while being a public employee. Mudzuri claims that Majongo violated the constitution by mobilizing votes for the ruling ZANU-PF party during the 2023 harmonized elections.


According to Mudzuri’s lawyers, Majongo is also a provincial deputy secretary in the ZANU-PF Women’s League. They say that she was granted leave from her official duties by senior ZANU-PF officials to carry out “national duty” such as voter mobilization programs for the party.


According to a report by New Zimbabwe, Mudzuri wants the High Court to declare that Majongo’s actions are unconstitutional and that she should be dismissed from the service. 


He also wants the court to declare that the Chairperson of the Prisons and Correctional Service Commission and the Justice Minister failed to ensure Majongo’s compliance with the constitutional requirements.


The Implications of The Lawsuit


The lawsuit has raised questions about the impartiality and professionalism of civil servants in Zimbabwe, especially those in the security sector. Critics say that some civil servants are loyal to the ruling party and use their positions to advance its interests.


This, they argue, undermines the democratic principles of accountability, transparency, and separation of powers. They also say that it creates an uneven playing field for the opposition parties, who face harassment and intimidation from state agents.


On the other hand, some supporters of the ruling party say that civil servants have the right to exercise their political freedoms and participate in the development of the nation. They say that the lawsuit is a ploy by the opposition to discredit the government and sow division among the people.


The Future of Zimbabwe’s Democracy


The outcome of the lawsuit could have a significant impact on the future of Zimbabwe’s democracy and human rights. If the court rules in favor of Mudzuri, it could set a precedent for other civil servants who are involved in partisan politics to face legal consequences.


This could also deter other civil servants from engaging in similar activities and encourage them to uphold their professional ethics and standards. It could also boost the confidence of the public in the judiciary and the rule of law.


However, if the court rules in favor of Majongo, it could embolden other civil servants to continue or increase their involvement in partisan politics. This could further erode the credibility and independence of the civil service and the security sector. It could also increase the mistrust and polarization among the citizens and the political parties.


Whatever the outcome, the lawsuit has highlighted the need for a national dialogue and reform on the role of civil servants in Zimbabwe’s politics. It has also shown the importance of civic education and awareness on the rights and responsibilities of citizens and public officials. Only then can Zimbabwe achieve a peaceful and democratic society.


You may also like

white logo with motto

The Zimbabwe Advocate is more than just a news outlet. We are a movement, a symbol of resistance against misinformation.

Latest News

© 2024 The Zimbabwe Advocate. All Rights Reserved.